WebDec 25, 2024 · In Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra, (2014) 9 SCC 129, following was held with respect to the place of suing: “…Once the cause of action accrues to the complainant, the jurisdiction of the Court to try the case will be determined by reference to the place where the cheque is dishonoured. WebOct 14, 2014 · A three judge bench of the Supreme Court, in the case of Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.1, holds that criminal complaints in respect of …
Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra Indian …
WebFeb 27, 2024 · Thereafter, in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod Vs. State of Maharashtra and another [ (2014) 9 SCC 129], a 3-Judges Bench of this Court observed that the return of the cheque by the drawee bank would alone constitute commission of the offence under Section 138 of the Act of 1881 and would indicate the place where the offence is committed. WebAug 31, 2024 · For filing of the complaint under section 138, Negotiable Instruments Act; Hon’ble Supreme Court in the landmark judgment of Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra, 2014 AIR (SC) 3519, imdb power of the dog synopsis
Dashrath+Rupsingh+Rathod+Vs Indian Case Law Law CaseMine
WebDECEMBER 23, 2004 VA DIRECTIVE 5383 7. g. Section 503 of the Supplemental Appropriations Act of 1987, Public Law 100-71, 101 Stat. 391, 468-471, codified at Title 5 … WebJan 3, 2024 · Although Dashrath Rupsingh is partly correct in saying that an offence is committed the moment cheque is dishonoured at the drawee bank, but it is to be noted … WebApr 23, 2024 · The SC, in the matter of Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod v. State of Maharashtra: (2014) 9 SCC 129, held that s.177 of the Cr.P.C. was required to be complied with and only the court exercising territorial jurisdiction where the offence was committed – i.e., where the cheque was dishonoured-could entertain a complaint under s.138 of the … imdb prey 2007